header-logo header-logo

Old Bailey security

13 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail
Barristers have been told they must remove wigs and gowns before leaving the Old Bailey, as this has been highlighted as a security concern

The City of London Police issued a security notice this month for all court users including counsel, clerks, noting briefs and solicitors, in response to increased security threats.

As of January 2024, legal professionals wishing to enter the Old Bailey must send a security pre-attendance notification or accreditation, must provide the name of their client-defendant or the defendant they are prosecuting, and must carry appropriate identification.

Counsel will continue to have a designated lane for entry and will be given priority on arrival.

Questions should be addressed to the City of London Security team at CCC-Security@cityoflondon.gov.uk.

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll