header-logo header-logo

Once more unto the breach?

10186978_4

Post Edwards, Stewart Duffy & Alex Leslie address the tensions between breach of contract & unfair dismissal

The consequences of the interaction between the common law action for breach of contract and its associated remedies and the newer statutory claim for unfair dismissal and the remedies available from the tribunal have been described by various law lords as “awkward”, “unfortunate” and “anomalous” and in need of “urgent attention by the legislature”. In the Supreme Court decision of Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKSC 58, [2011] All ER (D) 101 (Dec), Lord Phillips described it as a difficult area of law and acknowledged that it may need to be fundamentally reviewed.

Edwards: the facts

Edwards was employed as a consultant surgeon. His contract of employment included an express term entitling his employer to dismiss him on three months’ notice. For the appeal it was accepted that there were express terms relating to the disciplinary process and that the contract incorporated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll