header-logo header-logo

Once more unto the breach?

10186978_4

Post Edwards, Stewart Duffy & Alex Leslie address the tensions between breach of contract & unfair dismissal

The consequences of the interaction between the common law action for breach of contract and its associated remedies and the newer statutory claim for unfair dismissal and the remedies available from the tribunal have been described by various law lords as “awkward”, “unfortunate” and “anomalous” and in need of “urgent attention by the legislature”. In the Supreme Court decision of Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKSC 58, [2011] All ER (D) 101 (Dec), Lord Phillips described it as a difficult area of law and acknowledged that it may need to be fundamentally reviewed.

Edwards: the facts

Edwards was employed as a consultant surgeon. His contract of employment included an express term entitling his employer to dismiss him on three months’ notice. For the appeal it was accepted that there were express terms relating to the disciplinary process and that the contract incorporated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll