header-logo header-logo

11 March 2010 / Erich Suter
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Features , Mediation
printer mail-detail

As one door opens...another closes

Erich Suter sets out the European view of enforced mediation

Advocate General Kokott gave her opinion in Rosalba Alassini (Environment and consumers: C-317/08–C-320/08) dealing with Italy’s implementation of the Universal Service Directive (a directive on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks, Directive 2002/22/EC). 

For those with an obscure fascination in the dealings of the Italian electronic communications networks this article is likely to come as something of a disappointment. It is concerned purely with the legality of a procedural requirement adopted in Italy restricting the rights of end-users to bring claims against service providers to court. Italy in implementing the Universal Service Directive—which requires an out-of-court settlement procedure—decided to introduce a mandatory requirement that any end-user wishing to bring a claim against a service provider is obliged first to go through an out-of-court disputes process to try to achieve a settlement. If they do not they are barred from presenting a claim to the court. The end-users in these cases were complaining that the courts’ refusal to hear their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll