header-logo header-logo

03 October 2019 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7858 / Categories: Features , Employment , EU
printer mail-detail

One-sided flexibility: redressing the balance

The government’s plans to tackle one-sided flexibility in the labour market march in step with Europe… for now. Charles Pigott reports
  • The government has published a consultation paper on measures to address ‘one-sided flexibility’ in the labour market.
  • This follows the launch of the Living Hours Standard by the Living Wage Foundation and coincides with the publication of a new EU Directive on ‘transparent and predictable’ working conditions.

One-sided flexibility—a requirement for a worker to be available for work at very short notice, without a guarantee that any work will be available—was one of the issues addressed in the Taylor review. The review was commissioned by Theresa May soon after she become prime minister and published in July 2017 (see Good work: the Taylor review of modern working practices).

The Taylor review interpreted its brief broadly, which resulted in a focus not just on new forms of labour such as gig work, but on ‘good work’ in general. That said, it had long been a preoccupation of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll