header-logo header-logo

One size does not fit all

30 May 2012 / Amanda Melton
Issue: 7516 / Categories: Opinion , Divorce , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Amanda Melton argues against pigeonholing families within the law

There have been numerous discussions about contact after divorce or separation and how to prevent couples fighting through the courts over rights to see their children.

It is astonishing this has taken so much time to debate. That is not to suggest the issue is not one of huge importance, but rather that it should by now be obvious to us all that making all families fit into a pigeonhole is never going to work. Yes, we spend a great deal of money in families being represented in court, but has anyone stopped to ask whether these cases need the court’s intervention.

Norgrove report

The discussions started with the Norgrove report, published in November 2011. After investigation, Norgrove et al decided against a presumption of equality for parents. A subsequent announcement from the government stated an intention to introduce legislation compelling the judiciary to ensure each parent was able to see his or her children regularly/equally post separation. Now

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll