header-logo header-logo

09 December 2011 / Alan Sheeley
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Features , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

One small step for the UK...

Alan Sheeley forecasts the future of cross-border litigation

The European Commission published a proposal in July to create a Regulation to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters. The proposed instrument is known as a European Account Preservation Order (EAPO). It is intended to provide an alternative to existing domestic freezing orders in cross-border cases.

The Lisbon Treaty allows the UK to opt in to matters that affect UK civil law. If the UK does not opt in, then the Regulation will not affect the UK. The Ministry of Justice held a public consultation on whether the UK should opt in to the proposal, which closed in September. On 31 October the UK decided not to opt in. It will still be able to participate in the discussions to determine the final draft Regulation. If the Regulation is formally adopted then all member states apart from the UK and Denmark will be bound by it. Despite its profound concerns, the government continues to welcome the objectives of introducing the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll