header-logo header-logo

08 August 2019 / Simon Hetherington
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Features , Profession , Wills & Probate , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Online wills: even more dangerous than you think?

Simon Hetherington argues the greatest risk from DIY wills is in the profession’s response to them

  • Solicitors will not only harm their own interests but also the interests of the consumers if they fail to recognise that the wills and probate game has changed.

Earlier in the summer a piece appeared in this journal about the dangers of DIY wills (see ‘Reasons not to do-it-yourself’, NLJ 28 June 2019, p21). There was not much doubt that the primary target of the piece was wills that are drafted online and downloaded for execution, known as ‘online wills’. However, if solicitors believe that consumers can be deterred from going online to make their will by dire warnings of future problems stored up in a badly drafted or inadequate will, then perhaps they don’t fully appreciate the strength of demand for online or the sophistication of the supply.

In a test campaign by Macmillan Cancer Support, supporters were offered a free online will or a free

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll