header-logo header-logo

08 August 2019 / Simon Hetherington
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Features , Profession , Wills & Probate , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Online wills: even more dangerous than you think?

Simon Hetherington argues the greatest risk from DIY wills is in the profession’s response to them

  • Solicitors will not only harm their own interests but also the interests of the consumers if they fail to recognise that the wills and probate game has changed.

Earlier in the summer a piece appeared in this journal about the dangers of DIY wills (see ‘Reasons not to do-it-yourself’, NLJ 28 June 2019, p21). There was not much doubt that the primary target of the piece was wills that are drafted online and downloaded for execution, known as ‘online wills’. However, if solicitors believe that consumers can be deterred from going online to make their will by dire warnings of future problems stored up in a badly drafted or inadequate will, then perhaps they don’t fully appreciate the strength of demand for online or the sophistication of the supply.

In a test campaign by Macmillan Cancer Support, supporters were offered a free online will or a free

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll