header-logo header-logo

Will-making: reasons not to do-it-yourself

27 June 2019 / Elis Gomer
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Features , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Elis Gomer discusses the rise of the DIY will: more trouble than it’s worth?

  • Homemade wills are becoming increasingly popular, bringing a number of problems as well as benefits when compared to the traditional will.

Homemade wills are nothing new. For as long as there have been professional will-drafters, there have been testators willing to eschew their services in favour of drafting their own.

The Probate Registry has seen all sorts of curiosities over the years which are nonetheless valid wills, including at least one which was written on the outside of an egg. Do-it-yourself will packs have been available from various high street sources for years, and with the rise of the internet the number of people who decide to draft their own wills has never been higher.

In many respects, there is nothing wrong with this. Deciding who should benefit from an estate is an important step that too many people don’t take. Recent statistics suggest that roughly 60% of the adult population do not have a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll