header-logo header-logo

Will-making: reasons not to do-it-yourself

27 June 2019 / Elis Gomer
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Features , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Elis Gomer discusses the rise of the DIY will: more trouble than it’s worth?

  • Homemade wills are becoming increasingly popular, bringing a number of problems as well as benefits when compared to the traditional will.

Homemade wills are nothing new. For as long as there have been professional will-drafters, there have been testators willing to eschew their services in favour of drafting their own.

The Probate Registry has seen all sorts of curiosities over the years which are nonetheless valid wills, including at least one which was written on the outside of an egg. Do-it-yourself will packs have been available from various high street sources for years, and with the rise of the internet the number of people who decide to draft their own wills has never been higher.

In many respects, there is nothing wrong with this. Deciding who should benefit from an estate is an important step that too many people don’t take. Recent statistics suggest that roughly 60% of the adult population do not have a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll