header-logo header-logo

Will-making: reasons not to do-it-yourself

27 June 2019 / Elis Gomer
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Features , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Elis Gomer discusses the rise of the DIY will: more trouble than it’s worth?

  • Homemade wills are becoming increasingly popular, bringing a number of problems as well as benefits when compared to the traditional will.

Homemade wills are nothing new. For as long as there have been professional will-drafters, there have been testators willing to eschew their services in favour of drafting their own.

The Probate Registry has seen all sorts of curiosities over the years which are nonetheless valid wills, including at least one which was written on the outside of an egg. Do-it-yourself will packs have been available from various high street sources for years, and with the rise of the internet the number of people who decide to draft their own wills has never been higher.

In many respects, there is nothing wrong with this. Deciding who should benefit from an estate is an important step that too many people don’t take. Recent statistics suggest that roughly 60% of the adult population do not have a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll