header-logo header-logo

27 June 2019 / Elis Gomer
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Features , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Will-making: reasons not to do-it-yourself

Elis Gomer discusses the rise of the DIY will: more trouble than it’s worth?

  • Homemade wills are becoming increasingly popular, bringing a number of problems as well as benefits when compared to the traditional will.

Homemade wills are nothing new. For as long as there have been professional will-drafters, there have been testators willing to eschew their services in favour of drafting their own.

The Probate Registry has seen all sorts of curiosities over the years which are nonetheless valid wills, including at least one which was written on the outside of an egg. Do-it-yourself will packs have been available from various high street sources for years, and with the rise of the internet the number of people who decide to draft their own wills has never been higher.

In many respects, there is nothing wrong with this. Deciding who should benefit from an estate is an important step that too many people don’t take. Recent statistics suggest that roughly 60% of the adult population do not have a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll