header-logo header-logo

13 March 2008 / Paul Marsh
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Features , Company , Legal services , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Open all hours?

Image could be the difference between success and failure for smaller law firms, says Paul Marsh

The so-called “Big Bang” impact on the legal profession that the Legal Services Act 2006 is expected to cause has been labelled in some quarters as bad news for small- and mid-sized firms. While it is fair to say the legal services landscape will change, the outlook need not be bleak. Small high street law firms and mid-sized firms have the power themselves to adapt to new developments and ensure theirs is a thriving business.

There has been talk of the new legal disciplinary practices (LDPs) creating problems for many smaller law firms, but they create just as many opportunities. It should not have taken LDPs and the onset of alternative business structures (ABSs) to make some parts of the profession realise change is needed. The provision of high-quality legal services to individual consumers is not tied to any particular business model and the Act gives an opportunity to explore new ways of meeting clients’ needs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll