header-logo header-logo

13 March 2008 / Paul Marsh
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Features , Company , Legal services , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Open all hours?

Image could be the difference between success and failure for smaller law firms, says Paul Marsh

The so-called “Big Bang” impact on the legal profession that the Legal Services Act 2006 is expected to cause has been labelled in some quarters as bad news for small- and mid-sized firms. While it is fair to say the legal services landscape will change, the outlook need not be bleak. Small high street law firms and mid-sized firms have the power themselves to adapt to new developments and ensure theirs is a thriving business.

There has been talk of the new legal disciplinary practices (LDPs) creating problems for many smaller law firms, but they create just as many opportunities. It should not have taken LDPs and the onset of alternative business structures (ABSs) to make some parts of the profession realise change is needed. The provision of high-quality legal services to individual consumers is not tied to any particular business model and the Act gives an opportunity to explore new ways of meeting clients’ needs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll