header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007 / Helen Hart
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Opting out

The information watchdog has missed an opportunity to overhaul guidance on privacy regulations, says Helen Hart

Since December 2003 it has been illegal for UK companies to send unsolicited marketing e-mails or faxes, or make unsolicited marketing telephone calls. However, figures from CDMS, the data management company, show that over 30% of top UK companies breach the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2426) (the regulations).

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has taken steps to encourage, rather than compel, compliance by publishing updated guidance on the regulations (see the Guidance for Marketers on the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (the guidance)).
 

The guidance comes in two parts, on:
 marketing by electronic means; and
 the use of cookies, spyware and mobile phone location data.

The guidance concerning electronic marketing has been split down again into a section for subscribers ie the recipients of commercial e-mails, and a section for marketers. There are also new sections on viral marketing, corporate subscribers and the Telephone Preference Service (TPS),
e-mail tracking and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll