header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007 / Helen Hart
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Opting out

The information watchdog has missed an opportunity to overhaul guidance on privacy regulations, says Helen Hart

Since December 2003 it has been illegal for UK companies to send unsolicited marketing e-mails or faxes, or make unsolicited marketing telephone calls. However, figures from CDMS, the data management company, show that over 30% of top UK companies breach the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2426) (the regulations).

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has taken steps to encourage, rather than compel, compliance by publishing updated guidance on the regulations (see the Guidance for Marketers on the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (the guidance)).
 

The guidance comes in two parts, on:
 marketing by electronic means; and
 the use of cookies, spyware and mobile phone location data.

The guidance concerning electronic marketing has been split down again into a section for subscribers ie the recipients of commercial e-mails, and a section for marketers. There are also new sections on viral marketing, corporate subscribers and the Telephone Preference Service (TPS),
e-mail tracking and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll