header-logo header-logo

At our expense

10 July 2008 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Forensic accountancy techniques could be put to good use in assessing the validity of MPs' expenses, says Rakesh Kapila

There has been extensive media coverage this year on the expenses of MPs and MEPs, largely in relation to expenditure on second homes and travel and payments to family members and connected companies.

Although much media coverage relates to the overall level of expenses, eg by reference to the aggregate amount spent in renovating a kitchen or the total amount paid over several years to a family company, there has been less scrutiny of the validity of expense claims, primarily by considering whether expenditure has in fact been incurred for services “properly rendered” or goods provided to the MP concerned.

MPS' Allowable Expenses
Allowances

Before an appraisal of how MPs' expenses may be subject to detailed scrutiny, it is important to obtain an overview of the primary heads of expenditure claimed by them. Information available on Parliament's website in relation to “House of Commons: Members' Allowance Expenditure” includes the following details:

      
      (i)     the additional costs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll