header-logo header-logo

10 July 2008 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

At our expense

Forensic accountancy techniques could be put to good use in assessing the validity of MPs' expenses, says Rakesh Kapila

There has been extensive media coverage this year on the expenses of MPs and MEPs, largely in relation to expenditure on second homes and travel and payments to family members and connected companies.

Although much media coverage relates to the overall level of expenses, eg by reference to the aggregate amount spent in renovating a kitchen or the total amount paid over several years to a family company, there has been less scrutiny of the validity of expense claims, primarily by considering whether expenditure has in fact been incurred for services “properly rendered” or goods provided to the MP concerned.

MPS' Allowable Expenses
Allowances

Before an appraisal of how MPs' expenses may be subject to detailed scrutiny, it is important to obtain an overview of the primary heads of expenditure claimed by them. Information available on Parliament's website in relation to “House of Commons: Members' Allowance Expenditure” includes the following details:

      
      (i)     the additional

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll