header-logo header-logo

10 July 2008 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

At our expense

Forensic accountancy techniques could be put to good use in assessing the validity of MPs' expenses, says Rakesh Kapila

There has been extensive media coverage this year on the expenses of MPs and MEPs, largely in relation to expenditure on second homes and travel and payments to family members and connected companies.

Although much media coverage relates to the overall level of expenses, eg by reference to the aggregate amount spent in renovating a kitchen or the total amount paid over several years to a family company, there has been less scrutiny of the validity of expense claims, primarily by considering whether expenditure has in fact been incurred for services “properly rendered” or goods provided to the MP concerned.

MPS' Allowable Expenses
Allowances

Before an appraisal of how MPs' expenses may be subject to detailed scrutiny, it is important to obtain an overview of the primary heads of expenditure claimed by them. Information available on Parliament's website in relation to “House of Commons: Members' Allowance Expenditure” includes the following details:

      
      (i)     the additional

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll