header-logo header-logo

An own e-goal?

nlj_7645_chris-bryden-michael-salter

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter explain why common sense trumps policy in cases involving online misconduct

Does the sending of pornographic material to male friends and a junior female employee amount to gross misconduct? Mr Justice Lewis determined that it did in the recent case of Williams v Leeds United Football Club [2015] EWHC 376 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 218 (Feb). The case is important for a number of reasons. It has made headlines due to the nature of the parties. From a legal perspective, however, it is of interest for two main reasons: first, the fact that the misconduct in question was discovered five years after it had occurred, and after notice of redundancy had been given; and second, for its consideration of the applicability of the employer’s e-mail and IT policy.

The facts

The facts of the case are relatively straightforward. Evan Gwyn Williams was employed as the technical director of Leeds United from August 2006, having previously worked for Chelsea. His salary with Leeds

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
back-to-top-scroll