header-logo header-logo

An own e-goal?

nlj_7645_chris-bryden-michael-salter

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter explain why common sense trumps policy in cases involving online misconduct

Does the sending of pornographic material to male friends and a junior female employee amount to gross misconduct? Mr Justice Lewis determined that it did in the recent case of Williams v Leeds United Football Club [2015] EWHC 376 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 218 (Feb). The case is important for a number of reasons. It has made headlines due to the nature of the parties. From a legal perspective, however, it is of interest for two main reasons: first, the fact that the misconduct in question was discovered five years after it had occurred, and after notice of redundancy had been given; and second, for its consideration of the applicability of the employer’s e-mail and IT policy.

The facts

The facts of the case are relatively straightforward. Evan Gwyn Williams was employed as the technical director of Leeds United from August 2006, having previously worked for Chelsea. His salary with Leeds

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll