header-logo header-logo

09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Paper heavy?

Is the paper-free office a reality in legal firms? Debbie Jones thinks not

All industries are being tempted to go paper-free, but has the legal profession embraced the idea? Or are firms still too reliant on paper filing systems? According to our research the profession still relies on keeping hard copies of all key literature. The legal industry is still a paper-heavy sector and companies like ours, which supply legal firms with systems to store and protect legal documents, continue to experience a strong demand for the filing systems on offer.

A matter of culture

Firms often cite a number of reasons for continuing to be paper-heavy. Dene Rowe, IT director at Halliwells LLP, believes that the culture of not only litigation solicitors but also of the courts and associated public bodies is paper-based. Dene says: “In our legal processes there is an emphasis on context as well as content, and this is not easily described by an electronic system. It would be easy to pass this off as out-of-date thinking, but that really misses the subtlety

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll