header-logo header-logo

09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Paper heavy?

Is the paper-free office a reality in legal firms? Debbie Jones thinks not

All industries are being tempted to go paper-free, but has the legal profession embraced the idea? Or are firms still too reliant on paper filing systems? According to our research the profession still relies on keeping hard copies of all key literature. The legal industry is still a paper-heavy sector and companies like ours, which supply legal firms with systems to store and protect legal documents, continue to experience a strong demand for the filing systems on offer.

A matter of culture

Firms often cite a number of reasons for continuing to be paper-heavy. Dene Rowe, IT director at Halliwells LLP, believes that the culture of not only litigation solicitors but also of the courts and associated public bodies is paper-based. Dene says: “In our legal processes there is an emphasis on context as well as content, and this is not easily described by an electronic system. It would be easy to pass this off as out-of-date thinking, but that really misses the subtlety

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll