header-logo header-logo

09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Paper heavy?

Is the paper-free office a reality in legal firms? Debbie Jones thinks not

All industries are being tempted to go paper-free, but has the legal profession embraced the idea? Or are firms still too reliant on paper filing systems? According to our research the profession still relies on keeping hard copies of all key literature. The legal industry is still a paper-heavy sector and companies like ours, which supply legal firms with systems to store and protect legal documents, continue to experience a strong demand for the filing systems on offer.

A matter of culture

Firms often cite a number of reasons for continuing to be paper-heavy. Dene Rowe, IT director at Halliwells LLP, believes that the culture of not only litigation solicitors but also of the courts and associated public bodies is paper-based. Dene says: “In our legal processes there is an emphasis on context as well as content, and this is not easily described by an electronic system. It would be easy to pass this off as out-of-date thinking, but that really misses the subtlety

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll