header-logo header-logo

09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Paper heavy?

Is the paper-free office a reality in legal firms? Debbie Jones thinks not

All industries are being tempted to go paper-free, but has the legal profession embraced the idea? Or are firms still too reliant on paper filing systems? According to our research the profession still relies on keeping hard copies of all key literature. The legal industry is still a paper-heavy sector and companies like ours, which supply legal firms with systems to store and protect legal documents, continue to experience a strong demand for the filing systems on offer.

A matter of culture

Firms often cite a number of reasons for continuing to be paper-heavy. Dene Rowe, IT director at Halliwells LLP, believes that the culture of not only litigation solicitors but also of the courts and associated public bodies is paper-based. Dene says: “In our legal processes there is an emphasis on context as well as content, and this is not easily described by an electronic system. It would be easy to pass this off as out-of-date thinking, but that really misses the subtlety

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll