header-logo header-logo

25 July 2014 / Stephen Gowland
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

The paralegal conundrum

educationtraining_gowland

Can paralegals meet the market needs of the future, asks Stephen Gowland

Currently we don’t have a clear idea of who paralegals are, what they’re doing, what they will be doing in future, or even how many there are. We don’t know the scale of the challenges they are facing, but we do know their employers are facing tough times, and that, however much they want to offer progression to their paralegal workforce, budgets are tight and they face pressure from clients to keep fees down. How can we address these big questions facing our sector? And how can employers and paralegals work together to meet the demands of the future? We hope that the results of the Paralegal Enquiry launched by the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) last month, can help us find out.

What’s in a name?

We don’t know of any single accepted definition of “paralegal”. The term tells us nothing of the qualification or experience that person has and it also doesn’t tell you what type of legal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll