header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Parking lots

Do we have a right to park? Alec Samuels investigates

One might have thought that the answer to the question: “Is the right to park capable of existing as an easement?” would be simple, clear, straightforward, long-standing and authoritative. However, despite the tremendous pressure for space to park in our car dominated society, the matter is not clear, or not absolutely clear.

 

MONCRIEFF v JAMIESON

The matter came before the House of Lords recently in Moncrieff v Jamieson [2007] UKHL 42—reviewing the earlier cases. Unfortunately: the case came from (where the law is not necessarily the same as in ); the facts were extremely unusual; the right to park was not directly at issue; and some of their lordships did not decide the point directly. However, two judges, Lords Scott and Neuberger, seem to say that there is a right to park, Lord Mance seems to agree but does not expressly so decide, and Lords Hope and Rodger seem to accept a right to park (but neither

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll