header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Parking lots

Do we have a right to park? Alec Samuels investigates

One might have thought that the answer to the question: “Is the right to park capable of existing as an easement?” would be simple, clear, straightforward, long-standing and authoritative. However, despite the tremendous pressure for space to park in our car dominated society, the matter is not clear, or not absolutely clear.

 

MONCRIEFF v JAMIESON

The matter came before the House of Lords recently in Moncrieff v Jamieson [2007] UKHL 42—reviewing the earlier cases. Unfortunately: the case came from (where the law is not necessarily the same as in ); the facts were extremely unusual; the right to park was not directly at issue; and some of their lordships did not decide the point directly. However, two judges, Lords Scott and Neuberger, seem to say that there is a right to park, Lord Mance seems to agree but does not expressly so decide, and Lords Hope and Rodger seem to accept a right to park (but neither

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
back-to-top-scroll