header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Parking lots

Do we have a right to park? Alec Samuels investigates

One might have thought that the answer to the question: “Is the right to park capable of existing as an easement?” would be simple, clear, straightforward, long-standing and authoritative. However, despite the tremendous pressure for space to park in our car dominated society, the matter is not clear, or not absolutely clear.

 

MONCRIEFF v JAMIESON

The matter came before the House of Lords recently in Moncrieff v Jamieson [2007] UKHL 42—reviewing the earlier cases. Unfortunately: the case came from (where the law is not necessarily the same as in ); the facts were extremely unusual; the right to park was not directly at issue; and some of their lordships did not decide the point directly. However, two judges, Lords Scott and Neuberger, seem to say that there is a right to park, Lord Mance seems to agree but does not expressly so decide, and Lords Hope and Rodger seem to accept a right to park (but neither

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll