header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Partial enforcement of New York Convention awards

Janna Purdie looks at partial enforcement of New York Convention awards following a Court of Appeal decision earlier this month.

Perhaps surprisingly there was no English case law on the issue of whether or not a party could seek partial enforcement of a Convention award. The issue came before the court this month when Nigerian National Petroleum (NNP) appealed the issue to the Court of Appeal.

In delivering its judgment, the Court of Appeal clearly applied the spirit of the Convention, being the effective and speedy enforcement of awards, and took into account the importance of uniformity in the interpretation of international conventions. Under the judgment parties may now seek partial enforcement of a Convention award.
Facts of the case

Following an arbitration in Lagos, in which an award was made against NNP, NNP applied to the Federal High Court in Nigeria in 2004 to set aside the award (the challenge).

IPCO applied to the English courts in 2005 to enforce the award. Although that application was successful, Mr Justice Gross adjourned

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll