header-logo header-logo

13 May 2022 / Ashley Hodgkinson
Issue: 7978 / Categories: Features , Family , Profession
printer mail-detail

*Partner copy* Drug testing for legal matters & ways people try to cheat the system (AlphaBiolabs)

81376
Ashley Hodgkinson, Sample Collections Manager at AlphaBiolabs, looks at drug testing methods and some of the most common ways that people try to cheat a drug test

Court-ordered drug tests are performed every day across the UK for a variety of reasons, from local authorities making decisions about a child’s welfare, to family courts handling custody disputes.

However, we appreciate that not all legal clients are aware of which drug tests can best determine an individual’s pattern of substance abuse, or the ways in which people attempt to cheat a drugs test.

Before instructing a drug test, it helps to understand the testing methods available, and what different biological samples can tell us about a person’s drug use.

Drug testing methods

Each sample collection method offers us a differing insight into an individual’s drug use, from what they have consumed within the last few days (oral fluid and urine), to their drug use in the months prior to samples being collected (hair and nails).

The detection windows for each method of sample collection are:

  • Head hair: up to 12 months, with month-by-month segmentation available
  • Body hair: overview of up to 12 months
  • Nails: six-month overview (fingernail clippings) or 12-month overview (toenail clippings)
  • Urine: up to four days after consumption
  • Oral fluid (saliva): up to 48 hours after consumption

The consistent rate at which head hair grows means that head hair analysis is the only way of determining a pattern of drug use, using segmented analysis to identify trends such as an increase or decrease in usage over time.

When an individual consumes drugs, they are passed into the bloodstream, and the parent drug and a proportion of the drug’s metabolites enter the hair follicle.

When the hair is subjected to analysis at the toxicology laboratory the parent drug and its metabolites can be identified within the hair, enabling us to determine a pattern of drug use over a defined period, depending on the length of hair selected (1cm of head hair = one month of growth).

However, you may still wish to combine head hair analysis with other tests for a complete picture of an individual’s consumption.

Attempting to cheat a drug test

For drug test results to be admissible in court, samples must be collected under strict chain of custody conditions, reducing the likelihood of tampering, and ensuring samples are collected from the right people.

Yet there are still some individuals who will attempt to ‘cheat’ a drug test; something which can be easily prevented by using a trained sample collector.

Common methods include everything from bringing another person’s ‘clean’ urine sample to a collection appointment, to wearing a wig, or attempting to pass off someone else’s pre-cut hair sample as their own. People will even shave their head or cut their nails to prevent samples being collected.

While these methods are ineffective, it is important to note that excessive bleaching, dyeing, perming, or straightening of the hair has the potential to impact a drug test result. For this reason, we will always ask for full disclosure of any recent hair treatments so that this can be taken into consideration when preparing the results.

Whatever the circumstances, a trained sample collector – such as those in AlphaBiolabs’ nationwide sample collection network and walk-in centres – will know how to spot the signs of tampering and will be able to collect an alternative sample on the day if required (e.g. body hair instead of head hair).

However, if the court has ordered a specific sample for testing that cannot be collected on the day, an alternative appointment may need to be arranged for a later date to collect the correct sample.

Drug testing for legal matters

Understanding which drug testing methods will best suit your client, along with the ways in which people try to cheat the test, will help you secure a satisfactory outcome for your case.

At AlphaBiolabs, we have over 15 years’ experience providing first-class drug testing services for the legal sector, from sample collection to laboratory analysis and reporting. We also offer free sample collection for legal customers from any of our nationwide walk-in centres.

Legal clients can claim 15 per cent off all AlphaBiolabs legal drug testing services until 30th June. Simply cite DRUG15 when requesting a quote.

For expert advice on which drug test is best for your client, call the AlphaBiolabs Customer Services team on 0330 600 1300 or email testing@alphabiolabs.com and a member of the Legal Team will be in touch.

Image: © Shutterstock 

Ashley Hodgkinson
Sample Collections Manager at AlphaBioabs
Ashley oversees the day-to-day management of AlphaBiolabs’ sample collections department and a team of specially trained clinicians who operate across the UK. She also hosts AlphaBiolabs’ legal webinars and has delivered several bespoke training sessions on DNA, drug and alcohol testing to the Judicial College.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll