header-logo header-logo

10 October 2014 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Features , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

The partner pension conundrum

Roderick Ramage explains the formula

PA 2008 s 3(2) + ERA 1996 s 43A = AE 4 Ps where: PA = Pensions Act, ERA = Employment Rights Act, AE = automatic enrolment into a pension scheme; and Ps = partners. The catalyst for this article is Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Co LLP and another [2014] UKSC 32, [2014] 3 All ER 225. Partnerships as employers must enrol jobholders automatically into pension schemes under the Pensions Act 2008 (PA 2008), s 3(2), but partners themselves might be liable to be enrolled automatically.

A jobholder is a worker, defined in PA 2008, s 88(3) as “an individual who has entered into or works under (a) a contract of employment, or (b) any other contract by which the individual undertakes to do work or perform services personally for another party to the contract”, but by sub-s (4) this does not apply “if the status of the other party is by virtue of the contract that of a client or customer of a profession

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll