header-logo header-logo

Patent

19 February 2010
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences Inc [2010] EWCA Civ 33, [2010] All ER (D) 99 (Feb)

A first instance decision in England and Wales on a patent involved the intensive investigation and testing of evidence through cross-examination. Appeals were conducted on the evidence and materials before the court of first instance with no new witnesses or evidence, save in exceptional circumstances.

That procedure differed from the nature of proceedings in the Opposition Division of the European Patent Office (EPO) where there was much less room for the testing of evidence and more latitude for the admission of fresh evidence on appeal. The national courts were the final judges of validity of a patent which had survived in the EPO.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
back-to-top-scroll