header-logo header-logo

19 February 2010
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Patent

Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences Inc [2010] EWCA Civ 33, [2010] All ER (D) 99 (Feb)

A first instance decision in England and Wales on a patent involved the intensive investigation and testing of evidence through cross-examination. Appeals were conducted on the evidence and materials before the court of first instance with no new witnesses or evidence, save in exceptional circumstances.

That procedure differed from the nature of proceedings in the Opposition Division of the European Patent Office (EPO) where there was much less room for the testing of evidence and more latitude for the admission of fresh evidence on appeal. The national courts were the final judges of validity of a patent which had survived in the EPO.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll