header-logo header-logo

22 January 2010
Issue: 7401 / Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Patents and patents and trade marks

Patents and Patents and Trade Marks (Fees) (Amendment) Rules 2010 (SI 2010/33)

Amend the Patents Rules 2007, (SI 2007/3291), the Patents (Fees) Rules 2007, (SI 2007/3292) and the Trade Marks (Fees) Rules 2008, (SI 2008/1958).

The Trade Marks (Fees) Rules are amended by rules 13 and 14 which introduce a fee of £50 where Trade Mark Forms TM24, TM50 or TM51 are filed requesting to enter details in the Register of Trade Marks in accordance with rule 49 of the Trade Marks Rules 2008, (SI 2008/1797).

 

In force : 6 April 2010

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll