header-logo header-logo

Paying up

13 September 2007 / Barbara Hewson
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Do solicitors still have to pay counsel under the new code of conduct? Barbara Hewson investigates

On 1 July 2007, the new Solicitors’ Code of Conduct came into force. Ordinarily, the Bar does not take much interest in how solicitors govern themselves, but on this occasion the Bar has something to worry about. The new code has quietly dropped r 20.06, which provided: “Except in legal aid cases, solicitors are personally liable as a matter of professional conduct for the payment of counsel’s proper fees, whether or not they have been placed in funds by the client.”

According to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA):

“The Regulation Review Working Party undertook detailed research on the principles of professional conduct and decided that it was not necessary for the new Code to contain such a provision.”

It does not seem to have occurred to anyone that, by not taking account of the basis on which solicitors engage barristers in England and Wales, the new code is deficient, as it potentially places the solicitors’ branch of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll