header-logo header-logo

13 September 2007 / Barbara Hewson
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Paying up

Do solicitors still have to pay counsel under the new code of conduct? Barbara Hewson investigates

On 1 July 2007, the new Solicitors’ Code of Conduct came into force. Ordinarily, the Bar does not take much interest in how solicitors govern themselves, but on this occasion the Bar has something to worry about. The new code has quietly dropped r 20.06, which provided: “Except in legal aid cases, solicitors are personally liable as a matter of professional conduct for the payment of counsel’s proper fees, whether or not they have been placed in funds by the client.”

According to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA):

“The Regulation Review Working Party undertook detailed research on the principles of professional conduct and decided that it was not necessary for the new Code to contain such a provision.”

It does not seem to have occurred to anyone that, by not taking account of the basis on which solicitors engage barristers in England and Wales, the new code is deficient, as it potentially places the solicitors’ branch of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll