header-logo header-logo

13 September 2007 / Barbara Hewson
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Paying up

Do solicitors still have to pay counsel under the new code of conduct? Barbara Hewson investigates

On 1 July 2007, the new Solicitors’ Code of Conduct came into force. Ordinarily, the Bar does not take much interest in how solicitors govern themselves, but on this occasion the Bar has something to worry about. The new code has quietly dropped r 20.06, which provided: “Except in legal aid cases, solicitors are personally liable as a matter of professional conduct for the payment of counsel’s proper fees, whether or not they have been placed in funds by the client.”

According to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA):

“The Regulation Review Working Party undertook detailed research on the principles of professional conduct and decided that it was not necessary for the new Code to contain such a provision.”

It does not seem to have occurred to anyone that, by not taking account of the basis on which solicitors engage barristers in England and Wales, the new code is deficient, as it potentially places the solicitors’ branch of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll