header-logo header-logo

07 August 2008 / Edwina Millward
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Paying LIP service

How do litigants in person impact on court business? Edwina Millward explains

Shrinkage of legal aid and the level of lawyers' fees being out of the reach of the majority of the public without a conditional fee agreement or legal expenses insurance mean that, except in the House of Lords, your opponent these days will very often be in person. It's a situation which impacts in family as well as civil cases and, in the former, guidance just published is testament to it.

Every county court advocate has to deal with unrepresented parties. Their involvement in litigation is generally a complicating factor, calling for a different approach by both advocate and judge to that which might be adopted if all parties were represented. Where appropriate, the judge will be appreciative of discussion—if only as to housekeeping—between advocate and litigant in person (LIP) before the case is called and this should be reported on to the judge at the outset of the hearing. The litigant will often be grateful if the report is made by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll