header-logo header-logo

07 August 2008 / Edwina Millward
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Paying LIP service

How do litigants in person impact on court business? Edwina Millward explains

Shrinkage of legal aid and the level of lawyers' fees being out of the reach of the majority of the public without a conditional fee agreement or legal expenses insurance mean that, except in the House of Lords, your opponent these days will very often be in person. It's a situation which impacts in family as well as civil cases and, in the former, guidance just published is testament to it.

Every county court advocate has to deal with unrepresented parties. Their involvement in litigation is generally a complicating factor, calling for a different approach by both advocate and judge to that which might be adopted if all parties were represented. Where appropriate, the judge will be appreciative of discussion—if only as to housekeeping—between advocate and litigant in person (LIP) before the case is called and this should be reported on to the judge at the outset of the hearing. The litigant will often be grateful if the report is made by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll