header-logo header-logo

07 August 2008 / Edwina Millward
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Paying LIP service

How do litigants in person impact on court business? Edwina Millward explains

Shrinkage of legal aid and the level of lawyers' fees being out of the reach of the majority of the public without a conditional fee agreement or legal expenses insurance mean that, except in the House of Lords, your opponent these days will very often be in person. It's a situation which impacts in family as well as civil cases and, in the former, guidance just published is testament to it.

Every county court advocate has to deal with unrepresented parties. Their involvement in litigation is generally a complicating factor, calling for a different approach by both advocate and judge to that which might be adopted if all parties were represented. Where appropriate, the judge will be appreciative of discussion—if only as to housekeeping—between advocate and litigant in person (LIP) before the case is called and this should be reported on to the judge at the outset of the hearing. The litigant will often be grateful if the report is made by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll