header-logo header-logo

Paying up! The expert fees cap

225832
If an expert charges more than the Legal Aid Agency’s fee cap, who covers the shortfall? Dr Chris Pamplin reports
  • The Legal Aid Agency (LAA) enforces strict caps on expert witness fees, only allowing exceptions in rare, complex cases. This often leads to unfair cost burdens on better-resourced parties like local authorities.
  • In JG v Legal Services Commission, the Court of Appeal ruled that the LAA’s refusal to fund a court-ordered expert report was unlawful, highlighting the need for case-by-case assessment rather than rigid application of funding rules.
  • The Family Court, led by Sir Andrew McFarlane, has clarified that local authorities should not routinely cover shortfalls in expert fees. Updated LAA guidance now outlines stricter criteria and a checklist for seeking prior authority, aiming to ensure fairness and transparency in funding decisions.

Severe cuts in public spending have restricted legal aid, led to a cap on how much experts can be paid from legal aid, and created inequalities. If an expert charges

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll