header-logo header-logo

PayPal: free speech on lockdown?

21 October 2022 / David Locke
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Equality
printer mail-detail
98017
With political divisions growing ever more pronounced, demonetisation is emerging as one of the principal weapons deployed to silence debate, argues David Locke

The idea that an organisation specifically conceived and constituted to be a non-partisan defender of free speech could find itself the subject of an attempted ‘cancellation’ ought to be beyond parody. Nonetheless, that is exactly what happened to the Free Speech Union when in September PayPal closed its accounts, without notice or explanation. Given a significant proportion of its subscription fees were received this way, the future of the organisation was thrown into doubt, which is something PayPal must have appreciated was at least a material risk. In the event, following significant pressure on social media and criticism in Parliament, PayPal reversed its decision a week later—but that cannot be the end of the matter.

In March 2022, I wrote an article for NLJ which criticised the Trudeau government in Canada for using emergency powers to seize funds being sent to the trucker convoy protest in Ottawa,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll