header-logo header-logo

PayPal: free speech on lockdown?

21 October 2022 / David Locke
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Equality
printer mail-detail
98017
With political divisions growing ever more pronounced, demonetisation is emerging as one of the principal weapons deployed to silence debate, argues David Locke

The idea that an organisation specifically conceived and constituted to be a non-partisan defender of free speech could find itself the subject of an attempted ‘cancellation’ ought to be beyond parody. Nonetheless, that is exactly what happened to the Free Speech Union when in September PayPal closed its accounts, without notice or explanation. Given a significant proportion of its subscription fees were received this way, the future of the organisation was thrown into doubt, which is something PayPal must have appreciated was at least a material risk. In the event, following significant pressure on social media and criticism in Parliament, PayPal reversed its decision a week later—but that cannot be the end of the matter.

In March 2022, I wrote an article for NLJ which criticised the Trudeau government in Canada for using emergency powers to seize funds being sent to the trucker convoy protest in Ottawa,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll