header-logo header-logo

PayPal: free speech on lockdown?

21 October 2022 / David Locke
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Equality
printer mail-detail
98017
With political divisions growing ever more pronounced, demonetisation is emerging as one of the principal weapons deployed to silence debate, argues David Locke

The idea that an organisation specifically conceived and constituted to be a non-partisan defender of free speech could find itself the subject of an attempted ‘cancellation’ ought to be beyond parody. Nonetheless, that is exactly what happened to the Free Speech Union when in September PayPal closed its accounts, without notice or explanation. Given a significant proportion of its subscription fees were received this way, the future of the organisation was thrown into doubt, which is something PayPal must have appreciated was at least a material risk. In the event, following significant pressure on social media and criticism in Parliament, PayPal reversed its decision a week later—but that cannot be the end of the matter.

In March 2022, I wrote an article for NLJ which criticised the Trudeau government in Canada for using emergency powers to seize funds being sent to the trucker convoy protest in Ottawa,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll