header-logo header-logo

30 September 2011 / Alex Fox
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Pension deficit

istock_000009413327medium_edit_4

Can the cost of correcting discrimination be too high, asks Alex Fox

The High Court has ruled that Iain Cockburn, the widower of a Warwickshire GP, is not entitled to receive a survivor’s pension at the same rate as he would have done were he a widow in the same position. The decision, made in July, was based on the high cost of correcting this discrimination; the court felt that avoiding such cost amounted to an objective and reasonable justification for not eliminating the discrimination.

Cockburn was supported in bringing this test case by the British Medical Association, which has campaigned on this issue for many years. An application for permission to appeal is pending.

Background

Cockburn is the widower of a former GP and member of the NHS pension scheme. Dr Cockburn joined the pension scheme in 1982 and remained a member (making contributions at the same rate as male members of the scheme) until she retired on the grounds of ill health in 2007. She died shortly afterwards.

As

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll