header-logo header-logo

30 September 2011 / Alex Fox
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Pension deficit

istock_000009413327medium_edit_4

Can the cost of correcting discrimination be too high, asks Alex Fox

The High Court has ruled that Iain Cockburn, the widower of a Warwickshire GP, is not entitled to receive a survivor’s pension at the same rate as he would have done were he a widow in the same position. The decision, made in July, was based on the high cost of correcting this discrimination; the court felt that avoiding such cost amounted to an objective and reasonable justification for not eliminating the discrimination.

Cockburn was supported in bringing this test case by the British Medical Association, which has campaigned on this issue for many years. An application for permission to appeal is pending.

Background

Cockburn is the widower of a former GP and member of the NHS pension scheme. Dr Cockburn joined the pension scheme in 1982 and remained a member (making contributions at the same rate as male members of the scheme) until she retired on the grounds of ill health in 2007. She died shortly afterwards.

As

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll