header-logo header-logo

30 September 2011 / Alex Fox
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Pension deficit

istock_000009413327medium_edit_4

Can the cost of correcting discrimination be too high, asks Alex Fox

The High Court has ruled that Iain Cockburn, the widower of a Warwickshire GP, is not entitled to receive a survivor’s pension at the same rate as he would have done were he a widow in the same position. The decision, made in July, was based on the high cost of correcting this discrimination; the court felt that avoiding such cost amounted to an objective and reasonable justification for not eliminating the discrimination.

Cockburn was supported in bringing this test case by the British Medical Association, which has campaigned on this issue for many years. An application for permission to appeal is pending.

Background

Cockburn is the widower of a former GP and member of the NHS pension scheme. Dr Cockburn joined the pension scheme in 1982 and remained a member (making contributions at the same rate as male members of the scheme) until she retired on the grounds of ill health in 2007. She died shortly afterwards.

As

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
FIFA’s 2026 Men's World Cup is already mired in controversy, with complaints over ‘excessive prices’ and opaque ticketing. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys warns that governing bodies may face scrutiny under EU competition law, with allegations of a ‘dominant—if not monopolistic—position’ in ticket sales
Ten years after Brexit, UK and EU trade mark regimes are drifting apart in practice if not principle. Writing in NLJ this week, Roger Lush and Lara Elder of Carpmaels & Ransford highlight tighter UK scrutiny after SkyKick, where overly broad filings may signal ‘bad faith’
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
back-to-top-scroll