header-logo header-logo

19 April 2012
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Pensions

Raithatha (as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Michael Roy Williamson) v Williamson [2012] EWHC 909 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 909 (Apr)

On the proper interpretation of s 310(7) of the Insolvency Act 1986, a bankrupt did have an entitlement to a payment under a pension scheme, not merely where the scheme was in payment of benefit but also where, under the rules of the scheme, he would be entitled to payment merely by asking for payment. That interpretation was not an unjustifiable interference with his rights to property in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. Further, there was nothing to prevent a one-off payment, or a number of one-off payments on different occasions from different sources as a result of different entitlements, being regarded as payments in the nature of income from time to time made to him.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll