header-logo header-logo

Pensions

19 April 2012
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Raithatha (as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Michael Roy Williamson) v Williamson [2012] EWHC 909 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 909 (Apr)

On the proper interpretation of s 310(7) of the Insolvency Act 1986, a bankrupt did have an entitlement to a payment under a pension scheme, not merely where the scheme was in payment of benefit but also where, under the rules of the scheme, he would be entitled to payment merely by asking for payment. That interpretation was not an unjustifiable interference with his rights to property in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. Further, there was nothing to prevent a one-off payment, or a number of one-off payments on different occasions from different sources as a result of different entitlements, being regarded as payments in the nature of income from time to time made to him.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll