header-logo header-logo

08 November 2018
Categories: Legal News , Pensions
printer mail-detail

Pensions indexing ruling

Barnardo’s trustees did not have discretion to switch a staff pension scheme from the retail prices index (RPI) to the consumer prices index (CPI), the Supreme Court has held.

Ruling in Barnardo’s v Buckinghamshire [2018] UKSC 55, the Justices unanimously dismissed an appeal brought by Barnardo’s, the employer, which had proposed the trustees replace RPI with CPI as the inflationary index for the final salary pension. Increases linked to CPI are generally less than under the RPI.

The Justices held that RPI, which is specified in the scheme rules, must be used unless RPI is discontinued as a measure of inflation.

Stephenson Harwood partner Philip Goodchild, who acted for the trustees, said: ‘This judgment confirms that trustees and employers must be very cautious when considering a change of index.’

Categories: Legal News , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll