header-logo header-logo

08 November 2018
Categories: Legal News , Pensions
printer mail-detail

Pensions indexing ruling

Barnardo’s trustees did not have discretion to switch a staff pension scheme from the retail prices index (RPI) to the consumer prices index (CPI), the Supreme Court has held.

Ruling in Barnardo’s v Buckinghamshire [2018] UKSC 55, the Justices unanimously dismissed an appeal brought by Barnardo’s, the employer, which had proposed the trustees replace RPI with CPI as the inflationary index for the final salary pension. Increases linked to CPI are generally less than under the RPI.

The Justices held that RPI, which is specified in the scheme rules, must be used unless RPI is discontinued as a measure of inflation.

Stephenson Harwood partner Philip Goodchild, who acted for the trustees, said: ‘This judgment confirms that trustees and employers must be very cautious when considering a change of index.’

Categories: Legal News , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll