header-logo header-logo

The perfect moment

21 February 2008 / Jonathan Pratt
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice , Mediation
printer mail-detail

How do parties recognise the correct time to mediate? asks Jonathan Pratt

Is there a right time to mediate? If one side refuses to mediate until shortly before trial, should that party be penalised in costs? Can mediation take place too early? These issues were considered in the recent High Court case of Nigel Witham Ltd v Smith and another [2008] EWHC 12 (TCC), [2008] All ER (D) 101 (Jan). The underlying dispute related to fees for the design and project management of building works at a hotel. At trial, the defendants  were awarded damages of £1,683 in respect of one of their counter-claims. This sum was dwarfed by the defendants’ claim for £123,000 in costs.

The claimant sought to persuade the court to depart from the general rule that costs follow the event by relying on the ruling of the Court of Appeal in Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] EWCA Civ 576, [2004] 4 All ER 920 that a party to litigation who unreasonably refuses to engage

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll