header-logo header-logo

21 February 2008 / Jonathan Pratt
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice , Mediation
printer mail-detail

The perfect moment

How do parties recognise the correct time to mediate? asks Jonathan Pratt

Is there a right time to mediate? If one side refuses to mediate until shortly before trial, should that party be penalised in costs? Can mediation take place too early? These issues were considered in the recent High Court case of Nigel Witham Ltd v Smith and another [2008] EWHC 12 (TCC), [2008] All ER (D) 101 (Jan). The underlying dispute related to fees for the design and project management of building works at a hotel. At trial, the defendants  were awarded damages of £1,683 in respect of one of their counter-claims. This sum was dwarfed by the defendants’ claim for £123,000 in costs.

The claimant sought to persuade the court to depart from the general rule that costs follow the event by relying on the ruling of the Court of Appeal in Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] EWCA Civ 576, [2004] 4 All ER 920 that a party to litigation who unreasonably refuses to engage

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll