header-logo header-logo

21 February 2008 / Jonathan Pratt
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice , Mediation
printer mail-detail

The perfect moment

How do parties recognise the correct time to mediate? asks Jonathan Pratt

Is there a right time to mediate? If one side refuses to mediate until shortly before trial, should that party be penalised in costs? Can mediation take place too early? These issues were considered in the recent High Court case of Nigel Witham Ltd v Smith and another [2008] EWHC 12 (TCC), [2008] All ER (D) 101 (Jan). The underlying dispute related to fees for the design and project management of building works at a hotel. At trial, the defendants  were awarded damages of £1,683 in respect of one of their counter-claims. This sum was dwarfed by the defendants’ claim for £123,000 in costs.

The claimant sought to persuade the court to depart from the general rule that costs follow the event by relying on the ruling of the Court of Appeal in Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] EWCA Civ 576, [2004] 4 All ER 920 that a party to litigation who unreasonably refuses to engage

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll