Jonathan Pratt
In Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489, [1954] 3 All ER 745 the dispute revolved around the potential sale of a bungalow, which Mr Ladd wished to buy from Mr Marshall.
Matthew McCahearty & Jonathan Pratt applaud the flexibility of Wrotham Park damages
Eleanor Morgan & Jonathan Pratt explore the doctrine of benefit & burden
Matt McCahearty & Jonathan Pratt recommend keeping Pt 36 offers under review
Jonathan Pratt provides a statistical analysis of recent trends in City litigation
Damages or injunctions? Willie Manners & Jonathan Pratt report
In billing disputes is the client always right? asks Jonathan Pratt
A cross undertaking in damages can prove costly, says Jonathan Pratt
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris
Sheffield expansion continues with appointment of commercial property partner
Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan
Browne Jacobson strengthens banking and finance practice with latest partner appointment Paul Duggan
Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott
Employment partner joins Ward Hadaway
