Jonathan Pratt
In Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489, [1954] 3 All ER 745 the dispute revolved around the potential sale of a bungalow, which Mr Ladd wished to buy from Mr Marshall.
Matthew McCahearty & Jonathan Pratt applaud the flexibility of Wrotham Park damages
Eleanor Morgan & Jonathan Pratt explore the doctrine of benefit & burden
Matt McCahearty & Jonathan Pratt recommend keeping Pt 36 offers under review
Jonathan Pratt provides a statistical analysis of recent trends in City litigation
Damages or injunctions? Willie Manners & Jonathan Pratt report
In billing disputes is the client always right? asks Jonathan Pratt
A cross undertaking in damages can prove costly, says Jonathan Pratt
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Signature Litigation—Catherine Naylor
International fraud and asset recovery offering boosted by partner hire
Stevens & Bolton—Alexa Payet
Private wealth disputes team adds contentious probate specialist
Morgan Lewis—Paul Feldberg
Firm strengthens investigations and sanctions capabilities with London partner hire
