header-logo header-logo

15 April 2010 / Jonathan Pratt , Matthew Mccahearty
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Gain without pain?

Matthew McCahearty & Jonathan Pratt applaud the flexibility of Wrotham Park damages

Damages for breach of contract are normally measured by reference to the innocent party’s financial loss; the intention being to put that party in the position it would have been in, had the contract been properly performed. When damages are calculated on that basis, a claimant who has not suffered a loss will only be entitled to nominal damages.

However, there is a growing line of authority which provides for damages to be assessed by reference to the price of a release from the obligation which the defendant has breached, following a hypothetical negotiation between a willing buyer and a willing seller. This measure of damages is often referred to as Wrotham Park damages after the case of Wrotham Park Estate Company Limited v Parkside Homes Limited [1974] 1 WLR 798.

In Pell Frischmann Engineering Ltd v Bow Valley Iran Ltd & Others (Rev 2) [2009] UKPC 45, the Privy Council awarded Wrotham Park damages for breach of a confidentiality

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll