header-logo header-logo

11 February 2026
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Company
printer mail-detail

Perils of incorrect service highlighted

The High Court has clarified how winding-up petitions must be served, in a decision with implications for 30,000 UK businesses using the Companies House default address for official mail

HMRC, which was chasing DG Resources for a £1.1m tax debt, served the company with a winding-up petition. DG countered that the petition was incorrectly served to the company’s registered office since it used a Companies House default address, a temporary location intended to prompt companies to update their registered office details.

However, Mr Justice Marcus Smith struck out the petition, citing two main factors for his decision, in DG Resources v Commissioners for HMRC [2026] EWHC 201 (Ch). First, the irregularity was ‘a particularly serious one’, and second, ‘before the judge, HMRC put forward a defective contention that service had been regular when it was not’.

Marcus Smith J said: ‘Through the negligence of its agents, HMRC has put forward to the court below a materially false case, and obtained judgment in its favour on the back of this. Such conduct, even when unintentional, must have consequences... I reach this conclusion fully conscious that DG Resources has no substantive case against the petition. That weighs heavily, but where there is so serious a breach of due process it seems to me that this factor is insufficient to save the petition.’

Ian Austin, partner at Irwin Mitchell, representing DG Resources, said: ‘This judgment has provided clear clarification from the court that, when a default address is used for the purposes of serving a winding-up petition on a debtor, the action of service must strictly follow para 2(2) of Sch 4 of the Insolvency Rules 2016.

‘The document must be deposited at or near the default address in a way that ensures it will come to the attention of someone attending the office.’

Issue: 8149 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Company
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll