header-logo header-logo

11 February 2026
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Company
printer mail-detail

Perils of incorrect service highlighted

The High Court has clarified how winding-up petitions must be served, in a decision with implications for 30,000 UK businesses using the Companies House default address for official mail

HMRC, which was chasing DG Resources for a £1.1m tax debt, served the company with a winding-up petition. DG countered that the petition was incorrectly served to the company’s registered office since it used a Companies House default address, a temporary location intended to prompt companies to update their registered office details.

However, Mr Justice Marcus Smith struck out the petition, citing two main factors for his decision, in DG Resources v Commissioners for HMRC [2026] EWHC 201 (Ch). First, the irregularity was ‘a particularly serious one’, and second, ‘before the judge, HMRC put forward a defective contention that service had been regular when it was not’.

Marcus Smith J said: ‘Through the negligence of its agents, HMRC has put forward to the court below a materially false case, and obtained judgment in its favour on the back of this. Such conduct, even when unintentional, must have consequences... I reach this conclusion fully conscious that DG Resources has no substantive case against the petition. That weighs heavily, but where there is so serious a breach of due process it seems to me that this factor is insufficient to save the petition.’

Ian Austin, partner at Irwin Mitchell, representing DG Resources, said: ‘This judgment has provided clear clarification from the court that, when a default address is used for the purposes of serving a winding-up petition on a debtor, the action of service must strictly follow para 2(2) of Sch 4 of the Insolvency Rules 2016.

‘The document must be deposited at or near the default address in a way that ensures it will come to the attention of someone attending the office.’

Issue: 8149 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Company
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll