header-logo header-logo

11 February 2026
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Company
printer mail-detail

Perils of incorrect service highlighted

The High Court has clarified how winding-up petitions must be served, in a decision with implications for 30,000 UK businesses using the Companies House default address for official mail

HMRC, which was chasing DG Resources for a £1.1m tax debt, served the company with a winding-up petition. DG countered that the petition was incorrectly served to the company’s registered office since it used a Companies House default address, a temporary location intended to prompt companies to update their registered office details.

However, Mr Justice Marcus Smith struck out the petition, citing two main factors for his decision, in DG Resources v Commissioners for HMRC [2026] EWHC 201 (Ch). First, the irregularity was ‘a particularly serious one’, and second, ‘before the judge, HMRC put forward a defective contention that service had been regular when it was not’.

Marcus Smith J said: ‘Through the negligence of its agents, HMRC has put forward to the court below a materially false case, and obtained judgment in its favour on the back of this. Such conduct, even when unintentional, must have consequences... I reach this conclusion fully conscious that DG Resources has no substantive case against the petition. That weighs heavily, but where there is so serious a breach of due process it seems to me that this factor is insufficient to save the petition.’

Ian Austin, partner at Irwin Mitchell, representing DG Resources, said: ‘This judgment has provided clear clarification from the court that, when a default address is used for the purposes of serving a winding-up petition on a debtor, the action of service must strictly follow para 2(2) of Sch 4 of the Insolvency Rules 2016.

‘The document must be deposited at or near the default address in a way that ensures it will come to the attention of someone attending the office.’

Issue: 8149 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Company
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll