header-logo header-logo

11 February 2026
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Company
printer mail-detail

Perils of incorrect service highlighted

The High Court has clarified how winding-up petitions must be served, in a decision with implications for 30,000 UK businesses using the Companies House default address for official mail

HMRC, which was chasing DG Resources for a £1.1m tax debt, served the company with a winding-up petition. DG countered that the petition was incorrectly served to the company’s registered office since it used a Companies House default address, a temporary location intended to prompt companies to update their registered office details.

However, Mr Justice Marcus Smith struck out the petition, citing two main factors for his decision, in DG Resources v Commissioners for HMRC [2026] EWHC 201 (Ch). First, the irregularity was ‘a particularly serious one’, and second, ‘before the judge, HMRC put forward a defective contention that service had been regular when it was not’.

Marcus Smith J said: ‘Through the negligence of its agents, HMRC has put forward to the court below a materially false case, and obtained judgment in its favour on the back of this. Such conduct, even when unintentional, must have consequences... I reach this conclusion fully conscious that DG Resources has no substantive case against the petition. That weighs heavily, but where there is so serious a breach of due process it seems to me that this factor is insufficient to save the petition.’

Ian Austin, partner at Irwin Mitchell, representing DG Resources, said: ‘This judgment has provided clear clarification from the court that, when a default address is used for the purposes of serving a winding-up petition on a debtor, the action of service must strictly follow para 2(2) of Sch 4 of the Insolvency Rules 2016.

‘The document must be deposited at or near the default address in a way that ensures it will come to the attention of someone attending the office.’

Issue: 8149 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Company
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll