header-logo header-logo

28 February 2025 / Vijay Ganapathy
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Damages , Compensation , Health
printer mail-detail

Personal injury update: 28 February 2025

209436
Vijay Ganapathy discusses some key decisions in personal injury which will provide important guidance for future cases
  • Whether a local authority was vicariously liable for abuse perpetrated by a foster carer related to the victim.
  • Whether a claim should be stayed unless the claimant underwent medical testing.
  • Whether to give a claimant permission to seek damages from the police for an injury he sustained when he was apprehended by them.

Since the last update, a variety of issues have made their way to trial. One is vicarious liability, which has shown a pattern of expansion since the start of the century.

This is particularly so for cases involving abuse; for the recent ruling in DJ v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and another [2024] EWCA Civ 841, the Court of Appeal considered whether the local authority was vicariously liable for abuse the claimant (DJ) suffered as a child by a foster parent who was also his uncle. The lower court’s judgment of this case was discussed in ‘Personal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll