header-logo header-logo

28 February 2025 / Vijay Ganapathy
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Damages , Compensation , Health
printer mail-detail

Personal injury update: 28 February 2025

209436
Vijay Ganapathy discusses some key decisions in personal injury which will provide important guidance for future cases
  • Whether a local authority was vicariously liable for abuse perpetrated by a foster carer related to the victim.
  • Whether a claim should be stayed unless the claimant underwent medical testing.
  • Whether to give a claimant permission to seek damages from the police for an injury he sustained when he was apprehended by them.

Since the last update, a variety of issues have made their way to trial. One is vicarious liability, which has shown a pattern of expansion since the start of the century.

This is particularly so for cases involving abuse; for the recent ruling in DJ v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and another [2024] EWCA Civ 841, the Court of Appeal considered whether the local authority was vicariously liable for abuse the claimant (DJ) suffered as a child by a foster parent who was also his uncle. The lower court’s judgment of this case was discussed in ‘Personal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll