header-logo header-logo

18 September 2009
Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Pick a number

After separation, how do judges justify how the co-owned home is divided? asks Rowena Meager

The recent case of Jones v Kernott [2009] EWHC 1713 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 123 (Jul) concerned a claim by Ms Jones under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA 1996) for the determination of the beneficial ownership of two properties, 39 Badger Hall Avenue and 114 Stanley Road.

Facts of the case

Ms Jones and Mr Kernott formed a relationship in 1980. In 1985 they jointly purchased 39 Badger Hall Avenue for £30,000.

Ms Jones contributed £6,000 and the balance was funded by way of an interest only mortgage, supported by an endowment policy. The property was conveyed into their joint names.

The following year a further loan of £2,000 was taken out to fund an extension to the property which was built and paid for largely by Mr Kernott.

This enhanced the value of the property by almost 50%, from about £30,000 to £44,000. Ms Jones and Mr Kernott shared the household expenses including

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll