header-logo header-logo

Pick a number

18 September 2009
Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

After separation, how do judges justify how the co-owned home is divided? asks Rowena Meager

The recent case of Jones v Kernott [2009] EWHC 1713 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 123 (Jul) concerned a claim by Ms Jones under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA 1996) for the determination of the beneficial ownership of two properties, 39 Badger Hall Avenue and 114 Stanley Road.

Facts of the case

Ms Jones and Mr Kernott formed a relationship in 1980. In 1985 they jointly purchased 39 Badger Hall Avenue for £30,000.

Ms Jones contributed £6,000 and the balance was funded by way of an interest only mortgage, supported by an endowment policy. The property was conveyed into their joint names.

The following year a further loan of £2,000 was taken out to fund an extension to the property which was built and paid for largely by Mr Kernott.

This enhanced the value of the property by almost 50%, from about £30,000 to £44,000. Ms Jones and Mr Kernott shared the household expenses including

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll