header-logo header-logo

18 September 2009
Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Pick a number

After separation, how do judges justify how the co-owned home is divided? asks Rowena Meager

The recent case of Jones v Kernott [2009] EWHC 1713 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 123 (Jul) concerned a claim by Ms Jones under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA 1996) for the determination of the beneficial ownership of two properties, 39 Badger Hall Avenue and 114 Stanley Road.

Facts of the case

Ms Jones and Mr Kernott formed a relationship in 1980. In 1985 they jointly purchased 39 Badger Hall Avenue for £30,000.

Ms Jones contributed £6,000 and the balance was funded by way of an interest only mortgage, supported by an endowment policy. The property was conveyed into their joint names.

The following year a further loan of £2,000 was taken out to fund an extension to the property which was built and paid for largely by Mr Kernott.

This enhanced the value of the property by almost 50%, from about £30,000 to £44,000. Ms Jones and Mr Kernott shared the household expenses including

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll