header-logo header-logo

18 March 2010
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Plans to raise external capital

Law firms keen to raise non-partner finance

A “core element” of top 100 law firms is considering raising finance through an initial public offering (IPO), private equity or venture capital.
With just a year to go before the Legal Services Act enables law firms to raise external finance, one in five law firms say they would consider an IPO and 43% would look at venture capital or private equity, according to research by accountancy firm Smith & Williamson.

Nearly four in 10 of the 121 law firms surveyed would expect to raise £20m or less, but a handful of law firms would seek in excess of this. The firms surveyed included almost 60% of the UK’s legal top 100 and half of the top 20 firms.

“The days when law firms relied solely on partners to fund development are fading,” says Smith & Williamson director, Giles Murphy.
“While the general view has been that only a few legal practices will seek external finance as result of the Legal Services Act, our research suggests a core element of the top 100 law firms are thinking seriously about raising finance through an IPO, private equity or venture capital. Furthermore, 20% of respondents consider it ‘likely’ that they will look at raising structured finance for their own firm.

“This is in spite of—or perhaps precisely because of—the financial constraints of the last year or so.”

More than half of the firms would use the extra funds for long term development, while four in ten firms would use the funds for the recruitment of teams and acquisitions. Ten per cent of the firms have already appointed non-solicitors as partners or members, and a further 13% intend to do so, mainly within the next year. One in five firms has, or expects to, appoint its financial director as a partner or member. Other firms named HR and IT specialists as potential partners or members.

“This trend is likely to gather pace and will ultimately put law firms in a better position to attract the most professional and able individuals to run their firms and allow them to diversify away from their core provision of legal services,” says Murphy.

Meanwhile Grant Thornton have reported that many leading law firms have turned to banks for funding in the past financial year. The sum borrowed has risen to £591m in 2008–09 from £425m the previous year.
 

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll