header-logo header-logo

Plus ça change?

26 May 2017 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7747 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7747_parpworth

Neil Parpworth considers the constitutional implications of the usage of the powers contained within the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011

  • This article considers the relatively new statutory arrangements regarding the holding of early Westminster elections.
  • It questions whether much has changed in terms of a prime minister’s ability to influence the timing of a general election.

The events of 18 and 19 April 2017 will come to be regarded as significant in the UK’s electoral history since they reflect the first usage of a new parliamentary procedure for the causing of an early general election to be held. In the discussion which follows, some of the more important constitutional implications of this development will be considered, and it will be questioned whether despite the avowed purpose of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, the holding of an early general election very much remains at the discretion of the PM.

The relevant law

Prior to the enactment of the 2011 Act the timing of a general election was very much a matter for the government

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll