header-logo header-logo

20 November 2015 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7677 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Points of view

nlj_7677_zander

Michael Zander QC considers an interesting contribution to the debate on scrapping the Human Rights Act

The Conservative Party Manifesto for the 2015 election included a commitment to “scrap the Human Rights Act and introduce a British Bill of Rights”. On 8 September, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Mr Dominic Raab, told the House of Commons that the government would bring forward proposals “in the autumn”. On 3 November, Mr Jonathan Fisher QC, who was the Conservative party’s nominee on the coalition government’s Bill of Rights Commission, spoke to Politiae about what those proposals should contain.

Be bold

The government, he said, should be bold. “The UK Bill of Rights must be compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, but its terms should not be replicated”. The Bill of Rights should protect such basic British values as the right to trial by jury in serious criminal cases, the right to silence, the right to claim privilege against self-incrimination, the right to present a writ of habeas corpus, the right to equality,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll