header-logo header-logo

Points of view

20 November 2015 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7677 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail
nlj_7677_zander

Michael Zander QC considers an interesting contribution to the debate on scrapping the Human Rights Act

The Conservative Party Manifesto for the 2015 election included a commitment to “scrap the Human Rights Act and introduce a British Bill of Rights”. On 8 September, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Mr Dominic Raab, told the House of Commons that the government would bring forward proposals “in the autumn”. On 3 November, Mr Jonathan Fisher QC, who was the Conservative party’s nominee on the coalition government’s Bill of Rights Commission, spoke to Politiae about what those proposals should contain.

Be bold

The government, he said, should be bold. “The UK Bill of Rights must be compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, but its terms should not be replicated”. The Bill of Rights should protect such basic British values as the right to trial by jury in serious criminal cases, the right to silence, the right to claim privilege against self-incrimination, the right to present a writ of habeas corpus, the right to equality,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll