header-logo header-logo

20 November 2015 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7677 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Points of view

nlj_7677_zander

Michael Zander QC considers an interesting contribution to the debate on scrapping the Human Rights Act

The Conservative Party Manifesto for the 2015 election included a commitment to “scrap the Human Rights Act and introduce a British Bill of Rights”. On 8 September, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Mr Dominic Raab, told the House of Commons that the government would bring forward proposals “in the autumn”. On 3 November, Mr Jonathan Fisher QC, who was the Conservative party’s nominee on the coalition government’s Bill of Rights Commission, spoke to Politiae about what those proposals should contain.

Be bold

The government, he said, should be bold. “The UK Bill of Rights must be compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, but its terms should not be replicated”. The Bill of Rights should protect such basic British values as the right to trial by jury in serious criminal cases, the right to silence, the right to claim privilege against self-incrimination, the right to present a writ of habeas corpus, the right to equality,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll