header-logo header-logo

04 April 2020
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Powell Gilbert—Tom Oliver

Firm promotes senior associate to partner
Specialist IP law firm Powell Gilbert LLP has announced the promotion of Tom Oliver to its partnership, increasing the total number of partners at the firm to eleven.

Tom joined Powell Gilbert in 2010 as an associate before being promoted to the position of senior associate in 2015. During his time at the firm, he has represented clients in the English courts—the Patents Court, Court of Appeal and Intellectual Property Enterprise Court—and has also gained extensive experience in devising multi-jurisdictional patent litigation strategies with legal teams across Europe and North America.

Tom has advised clients on patent disputes spanning a wide range of sectors and technologies, including pharmaceuticals and medical devices, wind turbines, computer programming, smart phones and FRAND licensing. In addition to his patent litigation work, Tom advises across the full spectrum of IP rights, including trade mark oppositions and infringement proceedings, confidential information, copyright and passing off as well as assisting clients in relation to parallel trade strategies. He has also been involved in judicial review proceedings regarding the domestic implementation of a decision of the European Patent Office.

Dr Penny Gilbert, partner at Powell Gilbert LLP, commented: ‘Tom has proven himself to be an excellent IP litigator and adviser, drawing on his technical expertise and a wealth of legal experience to provide a first-class and highly valued service for clients. Tom will be a great asset to the partnership.

‘His experience in key areas of concern for our clients such as telecoms, tech and pharmaceuticals as well as his work on a wide range of IP rights is invaluable, especially as the demand for a holistic and strategic approach to IP continues to grow.’

Tom Oliver, partner at Powell Gilbert, added: ‘It’s a privilege to be joining the Powell Gilbert partnership. As a team we’re continuously striving to provide work and expertise of the highest standard possible to our clients and I look forward to continuing this work in the coming years.’

 

 

 

 

 

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll