header-logo header-logo

29 January 2016 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Powerhouse

nlj_7684_parpworth

Neil Parpworth on the matter of reforming the powers of the House of Lords

In its manifesto published prior to the 7 May 2015 General Election, the Conservative Party proposed to do a great many things if elected, including the introduction of “English votes for English laws” and the repeal of the Human Rights Act 1998. Progress has been made on both of these constitutional issues. Thus the Standing Orders of the House of Commons have been amended to provide for new legislative procedures in the case of “English-only” legislation, and the publication of a consultation paper on a British Bill of Rights is eagerly awaited. The manifesto contained no proposals, however, on House of Lords reform. Rather, it was made clear that this would not be a priority for a new Conservative government. Things have now changed as a consequence of the events which took place in the House of Lords on 26 October 2015 when their Lordships rejected the Draft Tax Credits (Income Thresholds and Determination of Rates) (Amendment) Regulations 2015 drafted pursuant to the Tax

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll