header-logo header-logo

29 January 2016 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Powerhouse

nlj_7684_parpworth

Neil Parpworth on the matter of reforming the powers of the House of Lords

In its manifesto published prior to the 7 May 2015 General Election, the Conservative Party proposed to do a great many things if elected, including the introduction of “English votes for English laws” and the repeal of the Human Rights Act 1998. Progress has been made on both of these constitutional issues. Thus the Standing Orders of the House of Commons have been amended to provide for new legislative procedures in the case of “English-only” legislation, and the publication of a consultation paper on a British Bill of Rights is eagerly awaited. The manifesto contained no proposals, however, on House of Lords reform. Rather, it was made clear that this would not be a priority for a new Conservative government. Things have now changed as a consequence of the events which took place in the House of Lords on 26 October 2015 when their Lordships rejected the Draft Tax Credits (Income Thresholds and Determination of Rates) (Amendment) Regulations 2015 drafted pursuant to the Tax

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll