header-logo header-logo

23 June 2017 / Clare Arthurs , Richard Marshall
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

A practical alphabet

nlj_7751_arthurmarshall

Clare Arthurs & Richard Marshall share an (almost) A-Z guide to civil evidence

Admissibility

Is the evidence admissible to the court? Your check list should contain privilege, admissions, illegally obtained evidence, self-incrimination…

Balance of probabilities

The civil standard of proof. More probable than not?

Cross-examination

Prepare your witnesses for the fact that the other side’s counsel is pursuing their own agenda. They are not seeking to explore every fact, but are usually seeking to elicit a certain response.

Discretion

The court has discretion to control the nature of evidence it receives, the issues on which and the way in which it receives evidence. It can also exclude admissible evidence and limit cross examination.

Evidential burden of proof

The obligation on a party to adduce sufficient evidence to enable the court to make a favourable finding on an issue.

Fact finding

What can you prove? The most important part of the process: keep asking questions until you are confident you have all the facts at your fingertips and know how to support

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll