header-logo header-logo

A practical alphabet

23 June 2017 / Clare Arthurs , Richard Marshall
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
nlj_7751_arthurmarshall

Clare Arthurs & Richard Marshall share an (almost) A-Z guide to civil evidence

Admissibility

Is the evidence admissible to the court? Your check list should contain privilege, admissions, illegally obtained evidence, self-incrimination…

Balance of probabilities

The civil standard of proof. More probable than not?

Cross-examination

Prepare your witnesses for the fact that the other side’s counsel is pursuing their own agenda. They are not seeking to explore every fact, but are usually seeking to elicit a certain response.

Discretion

The court has discretion to control the nature of evidence it receives, the issues on which and the way in which it receives evidence. It can also exclude admissible evidence and limit cross examination.

Evidential burden of proof

The obligation on a party to adduce sufficient evidence to enable the court to make a favourable finding on an issue.

Fact finding

What can you prove? The most important part of the process: keep asking questions until you are confident you have all the facts at your fingertips and know how to support

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll