header-logo header-logo

03 July 2018 / Clare Arthurs , Richard Marshall
Issue: 7800 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

A practical alphabet

nlj_7800_marshall

Clare Arthurs & Richard Marshall share an (almost) A to Z of all things expert

Adviser

Can be used prior to or alongside proceedings to better understand any technical issues and shape tactics and strategy. No duties to the court, and reports remain privileged; but costs will not be recoverable.

Be thorough

Make sure your expert understands what is required of them. Send them copies of CPR 35, the accompanying Practice Direction and the CJC Guidance for instructing experts in civil claims.

Changing experts

Neither cheap nor easy. Remember that CPR 35.4 allows the court to order disclosure of any pre-existing expert’s report if you wish to substitute them.

Duty to the court

A formally instructed expert’s duty to the court overrides their duty to those instructing them: important for client, solicitor and expert to understand and remember.

Expert determination

The lesser-known half-sibling of arbitration, does your dispute centre around an issue of valuation or scientific fact? Then this could be the cost-effective (but potentially unpredictable) ADR solution for you.

Form

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll