header-logo header-logo

07 August 2015
Issue: 7664 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice

Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Sinclair and others [2015] EWCA Civ 774, [2015] All ER (D) 273 (Jul)

When the claimant had failed to make a payment on account of costs on time, its appeal was stayed. When it applied to have the stay lifted, the judge treated it as an application for relief from sanction under CPR 3.9, refused the application and struck out the appeal following the guidance in Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Limited. The claimant applied to the court for reconsideration under CPR 3.1(7) after judgment had been given in Denton and others v TH White Ltd and another. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed the application and set aside the order. The judge had made his decision based on the principles laid down in Mitchell , but that had been a mistaken approach. Following Denton , relief from sanction would be granted.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

From global fraud cases to fishing off-grid, Mishcon de Reya’s chair of dispute resolution Hugo Plowman discusses mentors, management switching off

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law announces partner promotion and new hires amid a record year for enquiries

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis wills and probate team extends reach with two appointments

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll