header-logo header-logo

Practice

19 April 2012
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

DKH Retail Ltd v Republic (Retail Ltd) [2012] EWHC 877 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 22 (Apr)

CPR 30.5, on its face, could only apply to transfers to the Patents County Court (PCC) if the matter was one to which s 1 of Pt 63 applied, namely patent cases, and the other specific kinds of cases listed in CPR 63.2. That was because it was only in respect of those matters that the claims in the PCC formed a specialist list. Thus, if the case was an intellectual property claim properly proceeding in the general Chancery Division, and not the Patents Court, it would be one to which CPR 30.5 did not apply.

Accordingly, there was no need to refer such a claim to a judge dealing with claims in the PCC. Moreover, a Chancery master would have their usual jurisdiction in such a case and could order such a claim to be transferred to the PCC. CPR 30.5 did not apply to the transfer of cases between the Patents Court and the PCC. Accordingly, applications to transfer cases

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Legal director appointment bolsters public and regulatory team

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Firm appoints training partner and four new trainees

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Firm strengthens military claims team with senior associate hire

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll