header-logo header-logo

19 April 2012
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice

DKH Retail Ltd v Republic (Retail Ltd) [2012] EWHC 877 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 22 (Apr)

CPR 30.5, on its face, could only apply to transfers to the Patents County Court (PCC) if the matter was one to which s 1 of Pt 63 applied, namely patent cases, and the other specific kinds of cases listed in CPR 63.2. That was because it was only in respect of those matters that the claims in the PCC formed a specialist list. Thus, if the case was an intellectual property claim properly proceeding in the general Chancery Division, and not the Patents Court, it would be one to which CPR 30.5 did not apply.

Accordingly, there was no need to refer such a claim to a judge dealing with claims in the PCC. Moreover, a Chancery master would have their usual jurisdiction in such a case and could order such a claim to be transferred to the PCC. CPR 30.5 did not apply to the transfer of cases between the Patents Court and the PCC. Accordingly, applications to transfer cases

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft further builds national Professional Liability practice, hiring two partners in Bristol

NEWS
A child’s views can be taken into account during international child abduction proceedings, the Supreme Court has held
Small and medium-sized law firms have urged regulators to pause plans to exclude owner-managers from compliance officer roles
Lawyers have raised the alarm on employment tribunal delays and backlogs, with some cases facing a three-year wait for a hearing
The controversial assisted dying Bill has drawn to a halt after MPs defeated it by 286 votes to 270
MPs have called for legislation to protect against the human rights risks of artificial intelligence (AI)
back-to-top-scroll