header-logo header-logo

19 April 2012
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice

DKH Retail Ltd v Republic (Retail Ltd) [2012] EWHC 877 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 22 (Apr)

CPR 30.5, on its face, could only apply to transfers to the Patents County Court (PCC) if the matter was one to which s 1 of Pt 63 applied, namely patent cases, and the other specific kinds of cases listed in CPR 63.2. That was because it was only in respect of those matters that the claims in the PCC formed a specialist list. Thus, if the case was an intellectual property claim properly proceeding in the general Chancery Division, and not the Patents Court, it would be one to which CPR 30.5 did not apply.

Accordingly, there was no need to refer such a claim to a judge dealing with claims in the PCC. Moreover, a Chancery master would have their usual jurisdiction in such a case and could order such a claim to be transferred to the PCC. CPR 30.5 did not apply to the transfer of cases between the Patents Court and the PCC. Accordingly, applications to transfer cases

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll