header-logo header-logo

16 March 2012
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice—Documents—Disclosure

Various Claimants v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another [2012] EWHC 397 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 397 (Ch)

Chancery Division, Vos J, 27 Feb 2012

The outcome of any application under Pt 5.4C will turn on whether press reporting of parts of the relevant statement of case might create a substantial risk that the course of justice in the criminal proceedings will be seriously impeded or prejudiced.

David Glen for the applicant. Michael Silverleaf QC, Anthony Hudson and Guy Vassall-Adams (instructed by Olswang LLP) for the first defendant. Gavin Millar QC and Alexandra Marzec (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the second defendant.

The claimants were various persons who suspected that their phones had been “hacked” by the first defendant newspaper and the second defendant private investigator. They issued claims against the defendants in which allegations of breach of confidence and misuse of private information arising out of such interception of phone voice messages were made. Following criminal proceedings against the second respondent, a pre-trial review (PTR) was held at which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll