header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Practice—Family proceedings—Ancillary relief

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
20 June 2013
Issue: 7565 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd and others [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] All ER (D) 90 (Jun)

Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger P, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson and Lord Sumption SCJJ, 12 Jun 2013

It is well established that the court might be justified in piercing the corporate veil if a company’s separate legal personality is being abused for the purpose of some relevant wrongdoing; however, s 24 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 does not provide any wider jurisdiction to do so than the general law. It might however be possible in matrimonial proceedings to find that companies hold their properties on trust for a spouse, in particular circumstances.

Richard Todd QC, Daniel Lightman and Stephen Trowell (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the wife. Tim Amos QC, Oliver Wise, Ben Shaw and Amy Kisser (instructed by Jeffrey Green Russell Ltd) for the companies.

The appeal arose out of proceedings for ancillary relief following a divorce, in respect of which a decree absolute

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

Commercial disputes team lead promoted to partner

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Jersey finance and corporate practice welcomes new partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Firm launches solicitor apprenticeship programme with inaugural cohort

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: AI, liberty & the digital cage
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform in limbo
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Enforcement reform gets real
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
NLJ this week: Standish reshapes family & inheritance claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
NLJ this week: Clearing Christine Keeler’s name
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll