header-logo header-logo

24 May 2024 / Zoë Chapman
Issue: 8072 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Pregnant behind bars

174023
Steps have been taken to regulate the imprisonment of pregnant offenders, but do they go far enough, asks Zoë Chapman
  • Recent deaths of babies born in custody have sparked calls to further limit or prohibit the incarceration of pregnant offenders.
  • As of 1 April this year, most offence-specific sentencing guidelines include a dedicated mitigating factor: ‘pregnancy, childbirth and post-natal care’. But this may not be enough to protect the rights and safety of pregnant and post-natal offenders.

Rianna Cleary, aged 18, gave birth to her daughter alone in her cell at HMP Bronzefield. She had made two calls to prison staff for help, but these had gone unanswered. Later, a prison officer who shone a torch into her cell, where she was on her hands and knees in labour, simply continued on their rounds without stopping to help or raising the alarm. Once she had delivered her baby, Ms Cleary was forced to cut the umbilical cord by biting it off. In the morning, the baby, Aisha, was found dead in her arms.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll