header-logo header-logo

22 January 2025
Issue: 8102 / Categories: Legal News , Privacy , Media , Damages
printer mail-detail

Prince Harry and Lord Watson ‘vindicated’ as settlement agreed

Media lawyers have expressed surprise and admiration at the apology and settlement secured by Prince Harry in his claim against News Group Newspapers.

News Group Newspapers accepted for the first time that unlawful activity had occurred at The Sun and agreed to pay ‘substantial damages’. It also accepted responsibility for hacking former Labour deputy leader Tom Watson’s phone and placing him under surveillance.  

The eight-week trial before Mr Justice Fancourt had been due to begin this week.

Kishan Pattni, media lawyer at Freeths, said: ‘This is a colossal victory for the Duke of Sussex, but settlement comes as a surprise to the media law world, because he had publicly indicated that he required the truth and wished to achieve a reckoning against News Group Newspapers at court.

‘Indeed, it was rumoured that he would stand as a witness in the eight-week trial in pursuit of accountability. However, while detailed and potentially embarrassing facts for News Group Newspapers will no longer be aired, the substantial damages and open apology, which is remarkably contrite, will serve as an admission of their historic wrongdoing and provide full vindication for the Duke of Sussex and Lord Watson in the eyes of the public.’ 

News Group Newspapers stated: ‘NGN offers a full and unequivocal apology to the Duke of Sussex for the serious intrusion by The Sun between 1996 and 2011 into his private life, including incidents of unlawful activities carried out by private investigators working for The Sun.

‘NGN also offers a full and unequivocal apology to the Duke of Sussex for the phone hacking, surveillance and misuse of private information by journalists and private investigators instructed by them at the News of the World.

‘NGN further apologises to the Duke for the impact on him of the extensive coverage and serious intrusion into his private life as well as the private life of Diana, Princess of Wales, his late mother, in particular during his younger years.’

Jon Oakley, partner and reputation protection lawyer at Simkins, said: ‘This settlement is a complete vindication for the Duke of Sussex.

‘It is the first time in this lengthy saga that News UK has admitted unlawful newsgathering at The Sun. The Sun’s apology is for conduct that spans a full 15 years, from when the Duke was still a young boy to when he was a grown man.

‘The statement read on behalf of The Sun in court indicates the strength of the Duke’s case, and rewards his determination for taking action against a hugely powerful media organisation.’

Issue: 8102 / Categories: Legal News , Privacy , Media , Damages
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll