header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019 / Trevor Sterling
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Features , Profession , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Priorities for the march to equality

10007
Tackling unconscious bias is key to achieving equality, writes Trevor Sterling

I have seen a significant amount of change during my 35-year career in law, most notably the improvement and increased focus on diversity in law firms. These steps forward have been a result of societal changes and conscious initiatives from the legal profession as it becomes more cognisant of the barriers facing minorities. Nevertheless, as a profession we have not achieved true equality yet, particularly at partner level, and momentum must be maintained. Not only has this been important to ensure our profession is representative of the society we serve, it is increasingly accepted that diversity is good for business, with recent statistics suggesting that companies in the top quartile for gender and ethnic diversity outperform their competitors. We must tackle the remaining hurdles for minorities, in particular the biases people have without even realising it.

The latest data we have paints a positive picture for diversity. Statistics from the Law Society show women have outnumbered men

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll