header-logo header-logo

19 May 2011 / Tom Morrison
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Private eye

specialist_data_protection_morrison_4

Tom Morrison kicks off his quarterly review of the world of information law

We are all interested in what happens to our own information—how it is used, to whom it is given and how it is kept secure—and we want to know more about how well public authorities are being run. Former Prime Minister Tony Blair may regret it now, but when he came good on New Labour’s manifesto commitment to put the Freedom of Information Act on the statute books he set in train a series of events that would change the expectations of ordinary Joe Public forever. There is no turning back: data protection and freedom of information are here to stay. It will never be a vote-winner for any mainstream political party to pledge to reduce the protection afforded to individuals’ personal information, nor will it be popular to campaign on a promise to remove the rights of citizens to access information about how money is being spent in their name.

The regulatory noose has been tightening for some time to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll