header-logo header-logo

Private eye

25 July 2014 / David White , Tom Morrison
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail
dataprivacy_morrison-1

Tom Morrison & David White review the world of information law

Nuisance calls are well named. There can be few homeowners who look forward to the lotteries of “Will we get an uninterrupted night’s television?” or, “Will someone wake the baby by calling to enquire about how I purchase my electricity and gas?”. Relatives of new parents know not to call the main house telephone around the witching hour. Many telesales people, it seems, do not.

Unwanted marketing telephone calls are not a new problem. The industry has taken welcome steps over the years to try to alleviate the issue with initiatives such as the telephone preference service (TPS)—now with the force of law behind it—but clearly not everyone is playing by the rules.

Two businesses in particular have been highlighted by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for not only breaching the law by calling people on the TPS list, but also apparently trying to mask their true identities when calling. While they were issued with enforcement notices another company, Amber Windows,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll