header-logo header-logo

25 July 2014 / David White , Tom Morrison
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Private eye

dataprivacy_morrison-1

Tom Morrison & David White review the world of information law

Nuisance calls are well named. There can be few homeowners who look forward to the lotteries of “Will we get an uninterrupted night’s television?” or, “Will someone wake the baby by calling to enquire about how I purchase my electricity and gas?”. Relatives of new parents know not to call the main house telephone around the witching hour. Many telesales people, it seems, do not.

Unwanted marketing telephone calls are not a new problem. The industry has taken welcome steps over the years to try to alleviate the issue with initiatives such as the telephone preference service (TPS)—now with the force of law behind it—but clearly not everyone is playing by the rules.

Two businesses in particular have been highlighted by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for not only breaching the law by calling people on the TPS list, but also apparently trying to mask their true identities when calling. While they were issued with enforcement notices another company, Amber Windows,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll