header-logo header-logo

Private eye

25 July 2014 / David White , Tom Morrison
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail
dataprivacy_morrison-1

Tom Morrison & David White review the world of information law

Nuisance calls are well named. There can be few homeowners who look forward to the lotteries of “Will we get an uninterrupted night’s television?” or, “Will someone wake the baby by calling to enquire about how I purchase my electricity and gas?”. Relatives of new parents know not to call the main house telephone around the witching hour. Many telesales people, it seems, do not.

Unwanted marketing telephone calls are not a new problem. The industry has taken welcome steps over the years to try to alleviate the issue with initiatives such as the telephone preference service (TPS)—now with the force of law behind it—but clearly not everyone is playing by the rules.

Two businesses in particular have been highlighted by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for not only breaching the law by calling people on the TPS list, but also apparently trying to mask their true identities when calling. While they were issued with enforcement notices another company, Amber Windows,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll