header-logo header-logo

28 October 2011
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Privilege—Legal professional privilege—Documents

R (on the application of Ford) v Financial Services Authority [2011] EWHC 2583 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 140 (Oct)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court, Burnett J, 11 Oct 2011

The High Court has reviewed the principles applicable to joint interest legal privilege.

Hodge Malek QC and Saima Hanif (instructed by Withers LLP) for the claimant. Bankim Thanki QC and Andrew George (instructed by the FSA) for the defendant. The interested parties appeared in person.

The claimant and the first interested party (the executives) were directors of a company, Keydata. The second interested party was its compliance officer. A firm of solicitors, Irwin Mitchell, were retained in December 2007 by Keydata to advise in connection with an investigation by the defendant Financial Services Authority (FSA). It was common ground that the legal advice provided by Irwin Mitchell was privileged in the hands of Keydata. The executives believed, however, that Irwin Mitchell were also advising them as individuals and not simply as directors and officers of Keydata. In due course the FSA did

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll